Monday, 5 April 2010

Operational Risk ban for not having right control system

The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) has banned Martyn Powsney, the former director of Powsney & Co Ltd, an IFA firm based near Manchester, from holding positions of significant influence in any FSA authorized firm. Pownsey, who failed to put in place systems and controls to ensure that customers received suitable advice and failed to take sufficient remedial action, was found to be not fit and proper to run an authorized firm.

Following an initial visit in 2007, the FSA required Powsney to take action to rectify serious failings at Powsney & Co Ltd but, despite employing a compliance consultant to assist with the remedial work, he failed to take prompt, adequate action. A subsequent assessment by the FSA in 2008, as part of its assessment program for small firms, identified similar concerns to the 2007 visit.

The FSA has concluded that Powsney failed to:

  • establish appropriate systems and controls at the firm, 
  • demonstrate that the firm was providing suitable financial advice, and 
  • fully appreciate or adequately undertake remedial action required by the FSA.
Tom Spender, FSA head of department, enforcement and financial crime, said:

“Powsney lacked competence and capability. Even when FSA staff visited the firm in 2007 and 2008 and set remedial action, Powsney failed to implement the required changes.

"It is vital that those running firms have the necessary competence and capability to put systems and controls in place to ensure that suitable advice is given and customers are treated fairly. Individuals who do not have these qualities are a risk to consumers and face being banned.”

The 2008 visit to the firm was part of the assessment programme for small firms. Firms who fail to have in place appropriate systems and controls to demonstrate that they are treating their customers fairly will continue to be identified through the FSA’s Small Firms assessment program and action, including enforcement where appropriate, will be taken.

Powsney & Co Ltd, is currently in liquidation and is no longer authorized to conduct regulated business.

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

South African Mobile Banking

A “land grab” is under way in South Africa's mobile phone and banking industries as big companies — retailers, banks and telecommunications operators — begin vying for a stake of the fast-emerging market for mobile payments. So writes Duncan McLeod in TechCentral (http://www.techcentral.co.za/inside-sas-mobile-payments-land-grab/13674/ )

Significant announcements are being made virtually every week, as SA’s big four banks and the country’s mobile operators make a play for what could become a lucrative new business — providing electronic financial services to the unbanked using mobile phone.

The past week saw two important developments. First, Vodacom confirmed market talk that it is partnering with Nedbank to introduce Vodafone’s M-Pesa in SA. M-Pesa, developed for Vodafone’s Kenyan subsidiary, Safaricom, has proved wildly successful as a person-to-person money transfer system in the East African nation.

The second big announcement came from Standard Bank subsidiary Beyond Payments, which is rolling a similar system in conjunction with retail chain Spar. Standard Bank’s offering, called Instant Money, is only available in the Eastern Cape — and soon northern KwaZulu-Natal — but will be expanded nationally this year.

Absa already has a solution, which allows consumers to use its ATMs to receive money sent to their mobile phone. It uses an electronic voucher mechanism. First National Bank, which was in the news last week for bringing US company PayPal’s full suite of online payment services to South Africans for the first time, offers something similar.

John Campbell, business development executive at Beyond Payments, describes what’s happening as a “land grab”. All the big banks and mobile operators are experimenting with different models, trying to find the one that will prove a massive success.
There’s no question of the banks backing away, either, as they view mobile payments and commerce as core to their future strategies, Campbell says. That means the fight could soon turn into a full-scale war.

“For Standard Bank, this is a must win,” Campbell says. “It’s our future.”
Beyond Payments was set up outside of the normal Standard Bank structures precisely so that operational issues in the rest of the bank would not distract it. It’s mandate is to come up with innovative new products, even if this means competing directly with long-established and core parts of the bank, Campbell says.

Instant Money isn’t Beyond Payments’ first product. Last year it introduced MiMoney, though it hasn’t taken off in quite the way that the company expected. The product, aimed initially at people without credit cards, especially youngsters who want to shop online, has developed a loyal following in specialist areas. For example, it’s become popular as a way of buying cellular airtime, and as a way of purchasing movie tickets.

People who do use it for online shopping do so not because they don’t own a credit card — they often do — but because it’s seen as a more secure payment mechanism, Campbell says.
Unlike MiMoney, Instant Money is targeted at people without any access to the formal banking system.

The idea behind Instant Money and rival services like M-Pesa is that because mobile phones are in the hands of virtually everyone, they’re an ideal platform on which to transact and move money around quickly. People working in cities, for example, can send money to unbanked family members in the rural areas, with neither party having to open a bank account.

“What we’ve launched with Spar is really backing another horse, as another feed into this whole [mobile payments] thing,” Campbell says.

Spar, which has 850 outlets, is an ideal partner, he says — it has stores catering to the more affluent parts of the population as well as stores targeting the poor, including those in outlying areas.

A flat R9,95 fee is levied on each transaction, with Spar collecting “the bulk” of that money.

Campbell says Beyond Payments will launch similar products with other retailers in time, though the Instant Money brand is exclusive to its deal with Spar.

“It’s flipping hard work to sign up retailers,” Campbell says. Beyond Payments has to train staff in each store so they know how to use the system and how to detect, for example, attempts at money laundering.

Consumers are already using the service to do interesting things, he says. For example, some people send transactions to themselves — handing in cash at the point of sale and converting it into electronic currency — so that it doesn’t get stolen, say, while they’re traveling on the taxi. They then draw the cash they’ve sent to themselves, when they need it. This obviates their need to open a bank account and makes their money less likely to be stolen.

Because these payment systems work over telecoms networks, some analysts have suggested that mobile operators could soon find themselves competing head-on with banks on their own turf. But Campbell thinks this is unlikely, especially in the SA context. He says operators more likely to partner with the banks — like Vodacom has with Nedbank for M-Pesa, or like MTN has with Standard Bank for MTN Money — than they are to go it alone.

“The [financial services] industry is still incredibly tightly regulated,” he says.
Even more regulation could be on the way. The SA Reserve Bank has said that eventually it would like mobile phone payment systems to interoperate, much like ATMs do via the Saswitch network. The central bank hasn’t set any deadline for this, though, as the market is still considered to be in its infancy.

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

Public Relations - How Not to Treat a Customer

Even though this is an extreme case, the “other bank” depicted in this advertisement is unfortunately typical of many real live banks today. I am sure we can all relate to this. It's a very clear lesson in how to NOT treat a customer.

This is certainly worth a watch…


Monday, 22 March 2010

Doing the right thing – A question of Ethics

I recently blogged on Finextra about Ethics and regulation in the financial world under the title “It is more about ethics than policing” (http://www.finextra.com/community/fullblog.aspx?id=3918 )

In this blog I wrote;

"So the FSA is going to beef up on its staff in the oversight of the banks. As I see it, this approached is doomed before it even starts. The regulator, whether it is the FSA or any other, cannot match both the expertise and the innovativeness of the staff in the banks. The reason for this is simple. The regulator cannot compete with the banks in terms of direct payments, like salaries, or other incentives like bonuses.


This gets the whole issue back to what got the financial industry into this mess in the first place.


Putting more overseers in to monitor what is going on is also of doubtful value. It is an approach that will only lead to lulling everybody back into a false sense of security (again). This will last only until the next crisis emerges.


The real solution lies with bank managements accepting, in all sincerity, that they do have a real obligation to abide by certain ethical standards (and bankers in their position of trust within the community should know all about this) and that profits are not the only game in town.


If they can't get this right then no amount of new rules or new inspectors are going to make any difference.”

Bryan Foss responded to my comments with the following;

“Absolutely agree - this issue is about ethics and no amount of expensive (funded by the consumer it aims to protect) regulation will be enough to counter the effects of boards with objectives that are misaligned from their stakeholders (whether customers, investors, employees, suppliers, partners or regulators).


As an NED I have a responsibility to represent all these stakeholders at different times and the ethical challenge makes sense on the board and in leading and being a member of the key assurance committees (Audit, Risk, Nominations and Remuneration for example).


There is some excellent work being done in this area, but so far with insufficient impact on the big banks, or even on the government or FSA as regulator. Too many 'same olds' are moved around or called back in so that things don't really change at all - just look at the FSA and UKFI, if you can find the key names or how the appointment process is supposedly 'transparent'.


One person who is starting to influence these boards and to shake things up with the various regulators (wider than the FSA) is Prof. Roger Steare, Corporate Philosopher with CASS (City University Business School).


There is much more to be done, but we may now be at, or very close to, the tipping point where ethics really count - and there are more than a few people ready to give a final push .......”

Roger Steare is the Corporate Philosopher (http://www.rogersteare.com/). He works with people in businesses all over the world who want to do the right thing. He helps them build trust and sustainability. This short video is like a breath of fresh air.

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

Bankers’ Bonuses in context

The UK economy is in a mess but the bankers that many hold responsible for this are still taking home jaw dropping bonuses. This illuminating graphic from Money.co.uk.

Click on the image below to enlarge.


Monday, 15 March 2010

Lehman Brothers kept billions off its books

It is the Wall Street equivalent of a coroner’s report — a 2,200-page document that lays out, in new and startling detail, how Lehman Brothers used accounting sleight of hand to conceal the bad investments that led to its undoing.

You can read the full article from the New York Times at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/business/12lehman.html?hp=&pagewanted=all

Friday, 12 March 2010

Asia's growing economic power

Asia is regaining the economic dominance it enjoyed a thousand years ago. However it still has some way to go. View this short video by the Economist.

 
Website Statistics mortgage payment calculator